Placement of a subcutaneous ureteral bypass in a Miniature Pinscher with presumed xanthine urolithiasis as a result of allopurinol treatment.

INTRODUCTION: This case report describes the long-term success of a subcutaneous ureteral bypass device in a dog for treatment of a ureteral obstruction. The suspected xanthine urolithiasis was secondary to treatment with allopurinol for leishmaniasis. The dog presented initially with lethargy, anuria and abdominal pain. Mild azotemia was found on biochemical analysis and abdominal ultrasound revealed bilateral ureteral obstruction. A subcutaneous ureteral bypass was subsequently placed using a standard surgical technique. The dog recovered uneventfully and the azotemia resolved within days. Follow-up examinations were performed every trimester for over three years and no complications like obstruction of the bypass tubes, urinary tract infection or azotemia were recognized during this follow-up period. Allopurinol was replaced with domperidone as long-term treatment against Leishmaniasis which resulted in a mild increase of the leishmania serum antibody titer. The subcutaneous ureteral bypass placement was successful and safe in this dog and is a valuable alternative in cases of ureteral obstruction also in dogs.

INTRODUCTION: Ce rapport de cas décrit le succès à long terme d'une dérivation urétérale sous-cutanée chez un chien pour le traitement d'une obstruction urétérale. L'urolithiase xanthique suspectée était secondaire à un traitement à l'allopurinol contre la leishmaniose. Le chien a d'abord présenté une léthargie, une anurie et des douleurs abdominales. L'analyse biochimique a révélé une légère azotémie et l'échographie abdominale a révélé une obstruction urétérale bilatérale. Une dérivation urétérale sous-cutanée a été mise en place selon une technique chirurgicale standard. Le chien s'est rétabli sans incident et l'azotémie a disparu en quelques jours. Des examens de suivi ont été effectués tous les trimestres pendant plus de trois ans et aucune complication telle qu'une obstruction du tube de dérivation, une infection urinaire ou une azotémie n'a été constatée au cours de cette période de suivi. L'allopurinol a été remplacé par de la dompéridone dans le cadre d'un traitement à long terme contre la leishmaniose, ce qui a entraîné une légère augmentation du titre des anticorps sériques contre la leishmaniose. La mise en place d'une dérivation urétérale sous-cutanée s'est avérée efficace et sûre chez ce chien et constitue une alternative intéressante en cas d'obstruction urétérale, y compris chez les chiens.

Ureteral stricture rate after endoscopic treatments for urolithiasis and related risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to accurately determine ureteral stricture (US) rates following urolithiasis treatments and their related risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines using databases from inception to November 2023. Studies were deemed eligible for analysis if they included ≥ 18 years old patients with urinary lithiasis (Patients) who were subjected to endoscopic treatment (Intervention) with ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), or shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (Comparator) to assess the incidence of US (Outcome) in prospective and retrospective studies (Study design). RESULTS: A total of 43 studies were included. The pooled US rate was 1.3% post-SWL and 2.1% post-PCNL. The pooled rate of US post-URS was 1.9% but raised to 2.7% considering the last five years' studies and 4.9% if the stone was impacted. Moreover, the pooled US rate differed if follow-ups were under or over six months. Patients with proximal ureteral stone, preoperative hydronephrosis, intraoperative ureteral perforation, and impacted stones showed higher US risk post-endoscopic intervention with odds ratio of 1.6 (P = 0.05), 2.6 (P = 0.009), 7.1 (P < 0.001), and 7.47 (P = 0.003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The overall US rate ranges from 0.3 to 4.9%, with an increasing trend in the last few years. It is influenced by type of treatment, stone location and impaction, preoperative hydronephrosis and intraoperative perforation. Future standardized reporting and prospective and more extended follow-up studies might contribute to a better understanding of US risks related to calculi treatment.

[Prognosis of ureteral dilatation during procedures using a ureteral access sheath in patients with urolithiasis].

AIM: To improve the results of treatment of patients with urolithiasis who underwent endoscopic interventions using a ureteral access sheath (UAS) by developing a predictive model of ureteral dilatation without pre-stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 patients with kidney stones up to 20 mm were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: in the group 1 (n=79) UAS of 12/14 Ch was used, while in group II (n=101) UAS of 10/12 Ch was inserted. In group I, 48 (60.8%) patients underwent micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy and in 31 (39.2%) retrograde intrarenal surgery was done, compared to 42 (41.6%) and 59 (58, 4%) of patients in group 2. A non-inclusion criterion was a history of ureteral stenting. At the stage of preoperative diagnosis, 60 minutes before the X-ray examination, the patient took a single dose of 80 mg of furosemide per os to improve visualization of the upper urinary tract. After digital processing of computed tomography data and 3D-reconstruction of the upper urinary tract using the DICOM image processing program "RadiAnt DICOM Viewer," a visual assessment of the ureter was carried out to exclude significant deviations and strictures. The ureteral width was measured at three points: pyeloureteral segment, the level of the iliac bifurcation and intramural part. The number of cases of successful insertion of UAS and the rate of damage to the ureteral wall according to the classification proposed by O. Traxer and A. Thomas (2012) were analyzed. The prediction of successful insertion of a UAS was carried out using ROC analysis. RESULTS: In group 1, successful insertion of UAS was observed in 37 (46.8%) patients compared to 84 (83.2%) patients in group 2. In the remaining 42 (53.2%) and 17 (16.8%) cases, respectively, placement of UAS was not possible due to significant tissue resistance and high risk of traumatic injury. The average ureteral diameter at the points of physiological narrowing in patients with successful insertion of 12/14 Ch UAS were 2.0+/-0.1 mm, compared to 1.2+/-0.4 mm in those with failed insertion (p<0.05). In the group 2, similar indicators were 1.6+/-0.1 mm and 1.2+/-0.5 mm, respectively (p<0.05). According to ROC analysis, the diagnostic efficiency of the predictive model when using 12/14 Ch and 10/12 Ch UAS was confirmed by high AUC values (0.925 [95% CI 0.871-0.98] and 0.944 [95% CI 0.89=0.97], respectively). The total number of patients with ureteral injuries was 35 (44.3%) and 40 (39.6%) in groups with 12/14 Ch and 10/12 Ch UAS, respectively. At the same time, complications of the I degree were observed in 24 (30.4%) patients of the group 1 and in 31 (30.7%) patients of the group 2, while injuries of II degree were detected in 10 (12.7%) and 9 (8.9%) cases, respectively (p>0.05). Only in 1 (1.3%) patient, when 12/14 Ch UAS was inserted, grade III damage to the ureteral wall was determined. CONCLUSION: The proposed technique for measuring the cross-section of the ureter allows to predict the successful insertion of UAS at the preoperative stage. The probability of successful passage of UAS of 10/12 and 12/14 Ch in patients with ureteral diameter in physiological narrowings of more than 1.6 mm and 2 mm, respectively, is 95%. An insertion of UAS is a safe procedure, and most complications are classified as grades I or II.

Impacto del uso de la vaina de acceso ureteral durante la ureteroscopia flexible: estudio comparativo de eficacia y seguridad / Impact of ureteric access sheath use during flexible ureteroscopy: A comparative study on efficacy and safety

Objetivos Este estudio evalúa el impacto del uso de una vaina de acceso ureteral (VAU) durante la ureteroscopia flexible (URSf) para el tratamiento de la litiasis urinaria, centrándose en resultados como la tasa libre de litiasis, el tiempo quirúrgico y las complicaciones. Métodos Este estudio prospectivo y aleatorizado se llevó a cabo en el Hospital de Badr en la Universidad de Helwan y en los hospitales de la Universidad de Ain Shams, desde agosto de 2021 hasta agosto de 2022. Los pacientes se aleatorizaron sistemáticamente a 2 grupos (URSf con VAU: 33 pacientes y URSf sin VAU: 31 pacientes), y se sometieron a evaluaciones preoperatorias y postoperatorias, incluyendo pruebas de laboratorio y de imagen. Se controlaron los posibles riesgos asociados al procedimiento, como el fracaso en el acceso al cálculo, el dolor, el sangrado y la sepsis. Resultados Se observó que los 2 grupos eran comparables en cuanto a características demográficas o hallazgos preoperatorios de la litiasis (p>0,05 para todos). Sin embargo, el tiempo quirúrgico fue menor en el grupo tratado sin VAU (79,4±15,3 vs. 90,4±16,7min en el grupo tratado con VAU; p=0,008). Las tasas de complicaciones intraoperatorias, incluidos el fracaso del acceso, la interrupción de la operación, las lesiones ureterales y el sangrado, fueron comparables en ambos grupos (p>0,05). No se observaron diferencias significativas en cuanto a la tasa libre de litiasis postoperatoria (78,8 vs. 71,0%; p=0,305) y el tamaño litiásico residual medio (2,7±3,5 vs. 3,1±3,1mm; p=0,687). Conclusiones El presente estudio sugiere que URSf sin VAU puede ofrecer una opción eficiente e igualmente efectiva para el tratamiento de los cálculos renales y de uréter superior. Sin embargo, se necesitan más estudios con muestras de mayor tamaño y periodos de seguimiento más largos para validar estos resultados y establecer indicaciones más precisas para este procedimiento. (AU)

Objectives This study evaluates the impact of using an access sheath (AS) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for urolithiasis treatment, focusing on outcomes such as stone-free rate, operation time, and complications. Methods This prospective, randomized study was carried out at Badr Hospital, Helwan University, and Ain Shams University hospitals from August 2021 to August 2022. Patients were systematically randomized into two groups (fURS with AS: 33 patients and without AS: 31 patients) and underwent preoperative and postoperative assessments, including lab tests and imaging. Possible procedure-associated risks, such as failed stone access, pain, bleeding, and sepsis, were monitored. Results The two groups were found to be comparable in terms of demographic characteristics or preoperative stone findings (P>.05 for all). However, operation duration was shorter in the No Sheath group (79.4±15.3minutes vs. 90.4±16.7minutes in the Sheath group, P=.008). Intraoperative complication rates, including failed access, operation termination, ureteric injury, and bleeding, were comparable in both groups (P>.05). Postoperative stone-free rates (78.8% vs. 71.0%, P=.305) and mean residual stone size (2.7±3.5mm vs. 3.1±3.1mm, P=.687) showed no significant differences. Conclusions The present study suggests that fURS without an access sheath may offer an efficient and equally effective option for managing upper ureteric and renal stones. However, more studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to validate these findings and to establish more precise indications for this approach. (AU)

Follow-up of urolithiasis patients after treatment: an algorithm from the EAU Urolithiasis Panel.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a follow-up algorithm for urinary stone patients after definitive treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel performed a systematic review on follow-up of urinary stone patients after treatment (PROSPERO: CRD42020205739). Given the lack of comparative studies we critically evaluated the literature and reached a consensus on the follow-up scheme. RESULTS: A total of 76 studies were included in the analysis, including 17 RCTs. In the stone-free general population group, 71-100% of patients are stone-free at 12 months while 29-94% remain stone-free at 36 months. We propose counselling these patients on imaging versus discharge after the first year. The stone-free rate in high-risk patients not receiving targeted medical therapy is < 40% at 36 months, a fact that supports imaging, metabolic, and treatment monitoring follow-up once a year. Patients with residual fragments ≤ 4 mm have a spontaneous expulsion rate of 18-47% and a growth rate of 10-41% at 12 months, supporting annual imaging follow-up. Patients with residual fragments > 4 mm should be considered for surgical re-intervention based on the low spontaneous expulsion rate (13% at 1 year) and high risk of recurrence. Plain film KUB and/or kidney ultrasonography based on clinicians' preference and stone characteristics is the preferred imaging follow-up. Computed tomography should be considered if patient is symptomatic or intervention is planned. CONCLUSIONS: Based on evidence from the systematic review we propose, for the first time, a follow-up algorithm for patients after surgical stone treatment balancing the risks of stone recurrence against the burden of radiation from imaging studies.

Ho:YAG laser and dusting-high power vs low power: there is no difference.

The introduction of the Ho:YAG laser 3 decades ago revolutionized the endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis. Since then, a variety of innovations have continued to evolve these devices, including the development of high-power lasers capable of high-frequency lithotripsy. The clinical utility of high-frequency lithotripsy, however, has not necessarily lived up to the potential suggested by in vitro studies. A review of the relevant literature, confirming strong similarities between the outcomes associated with high and lower power laser lithotripsy, follows.

Modified tube cystostomy technique for management of obstructive urolithiasis in small ruminants: procedure and outcome in 17 sheep and goats.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical technique and clinical outcome of small ruminants treated for obstructive urolithiasis using a modified tube cystostomy (MTC) technique. ANIMALS: 15 goats and 2 sheep treated with an MTC between March 2018 and February 2023. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: Animals were diagnosed with obstructive urolithiasis on the basis of history, physical examination, and ultrasonographic examination. An MTC was performed with sedation and a local block. Postoperative medical management was instituted to help reestablish urethral patency, and Foley catheters were removed after successful urination. RESULTS: Animals were hospitalized an average of 3 nights (range, 0 to 14 nights). Complications included urine spillage in the abdomen and accidental deflation of the Foley balloon. Six animals were euthanized due to poor prognosis or failure to regain urethral patency. Foley catheters were removed an average of 15.7 days postoperatively in animals that regained urethral patency. Long-term (> 1-month) follow-up was available for 8 animals, with an average postoperative survival time of 19.4 months (range, 1 to 58 months). Four animals were lost to long-term follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This MTC technique is an effective means of catheterizing the urinary bladder in small ruminants. It can be performed under field conditions and serve as a standalone procedure for providing temporary urine egress. Patient size is limited by the length of the introducer, and an intact, distended urinary bladder and plan for reestablishing urethral patency are important considerations.

Place of urolithiasis in the spectrum of urological pathologies, practices and use of endourological procedures in the management of calculi of the upper urinary tract: results of a survey of referral centres in Africa.

Our aim was to determine the current trend of endourology in the management of upper urinary tract calculi in Africa reference centres. We conducted an online multiple-choice questionnaire survey involving 46 centres from 27 countries using a structured well-designed Google Form (®) questionnaire. The questionnaires were distributed to the head of service through their emails. The questions collected demographic data about the centre, the epidemiology of urolithiasis, diagnostic means and management of upper urolithiasis, especially access to endourology procedures and their practices. Descriptive analyses were performed. The participation rate was 77.9%. Urinary lithiasis was one of the three main pathologies encountered in 42/46 centres. 33 centres had easy access to CT scanners and 34 had operating theatres equipped with endo-urological surgery equipment. Of these 34 centres, 30 perform endourology for the management of upper urinary tract stones. Rigid ureteroscopy is the main technique used by the centres. It is the only endourology technique used for stone management by 12 centres (40%). 7/30 (23.3%) have the option of performing rigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The frequency of procedures varies widely, with 43.3% rarely performing endourological surgery. Seventeen centres have their operating theatre equipped with a fluoroscope and 6/42 centres have extracorporeal lithotripsy. Open surgery is still used in 29/42 centres (69.1%). Laparoscopy is available in 50% of centres, but none reported performing laparoscopic lithotomy. In Africa, urinary lithiasis plays an important role in the activities of referral centres. Modern management techniques are used to varying degrees (not all centres have them) and with very variable frequency. Open surgery is still widely performed as a management. Rigid ureteroscopy is the main endourological technique. It is essential to develop the practice of modern urology in Africa, mainly endourology.

Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of urolithiasis: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training-Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group.

PURPOSE: To identify laser lithotripsy settings used by experts for specific clinical scenarios and to identify preventive measures to reduce complications. METHODS: After literature research to identify relevant questions, a survey was conducted and sent to laser experts. Participants were asked for preferred laser settings during specific clinical lithotripsy scenarios. Different settings were compared for the reported laser types, and common settings and preventive measures were identified. RESULTS: Twenty-six laser experts fully returned the survey. Holmium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) was the primary laser used (88%), followed by thulium fiber laser (TFL) (42%) and pulsed thulium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Tm:YAG) (23%). For most scenarios, we could not identify relevant differences among laser settings. However, the laser power was significantly different for middle-ureteral (p = 0.027), pelvic (p = 0.047), and lower pole stone (p = 0.018) lithotripsy. Fragmentation or a combined fragmentation with dusting was more common for Ho:YAG and pulsed Tm:YAG lasers, whereas dusting or a combination of dusting and fragmentation was more common for TFL lasers. Experts prefer long pulse modes for Ho:YAG lasers to short pulse modes for TFL lasers. Thermal injury due to temperature development during lithotripsy is seriously considered by experts, with preventive measures applied routinely. CONCLUSIONS: Laser settings do not vary significantly between commonly used lasers for lithotripsy. Lithotripsy techniques and settings mainly depend on the generated laser pulse's and generator settings' physical characteristics. Preventive measures such as maximum power limits, intermittent laser activation, and ureteral access sheaths are commonly used by experts to decrease thermal injury-caused complications.

Uroliths composed of antiviral compound GS-441524 in 2 cats undergoing treatment for feline infectious peritonitis.

Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) historically has been a fatal disease in cats. Recent unlicensed use of antiviral medication has been shown to markedly improve survival of this infection. An 8-month-old female spayed domestic short-haired cat undergoing treatment for presumptive FIP with the antiviral nucleoside analog GS-441524 developed acute progressive azotemia. Abdominal ultrasound examination identified multifocal urolithiasis including renal, ureteral, and cystic calculi. Unilateral ureteral obstruction progressed to suspected bilateral ureteral obstruction and subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) was performed along with urolith removal and submission for analysis. A 2-year-old male neutered domestic medium-haired cat undergoing treatment for confirmed FIP with GS-441524 developed dysuria (weak urine stream, urinary incontinence, and difficulty expressing the urinary bladder). This cat also was diagnosed sonographically with multifocal urolithiasis requiring temporary tube cystostomy after cystotomy and urolith removal. In both cases, initial urolith analysis showed unidentified material. Additional testing confirmed the calculi in both cats to be 98% consistent with GS-441524. Additional clinical studies are required to determine best screening practices for cats presented for urolithiasis during treatment with GS-441524.

Ureterorenoscopy for stone disease in pregnancy: a literature review and update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of stone disease in pregnancy poses a challenge for all healthcare professionals involved in their care. During pregnancy, there is an increase in the incidence of urolithiasis. Major technological and procedural advances have been seen in the last decade for endoscopic management of urolithiasis. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive workup of available literature on use of ureteroscopy for stone treatment during pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 268 articles on screening, of which 28 were included in the final review. Overall adverse event rates were low, with no severe complications reported in the included studies. On multivariate analysis, the only significant correlation was an inverse relationship between calculated caseload and adverse obstetric events. No further correlation could be found between caseload, operation technique and adverse event rates. Data quality was low among the included studies. SUMMARY: While ureteroscopy is a relatively safe and effective option for active stone treatment during pregnancy, they should be performed in experienced endourology centres in conjunction with obstetric teams.

Management of Pediatric Urolithiasis in an Italian Tertiary Referral Center: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background and Objectives: In recent years, the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis has increased in North America and Western countries, though it is endemic in developing countries. The aim of this study is to describe the experience of a tertiary pediatric referral center in the surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the experience of patients ≤ 16 years old affected by urinary stones who underwent surgery. Results: From April 2021 to September 2023, 31 pediatric patients underwent surgical procedures for stone diseases at our department: 13 preschool-aged (1-5 years) and 18 school-aged (6-16 years) children. During this period, 12 URSs, 17 RIRSs, and 2 PCNLs were recorded. Five patients had residual fragments at first, so three of them underwent a second endourological lithotripsy (2 RIRSs and 1 URS). Complete clearance was finally achieved in 27 patients. The stone composition was evaluated in 25 cases. Conclusions: Numerous innovations in the surgical treatment of pediatric urolithiasis have resulted from the development of smaller devices and new technology. Our results show how, in experienced centers, retrograde and percutaneous lithotripsy are safe and effective procedures for use in pediatric populations.

24-h urine collection in patients with urolithiasis: perspective on renal function.

A prospective observational study involving consecutive patients diagnosed with symptomatic urolithiasis was conducted to evaluate the serial change of urinary protein and 24-h urine chemistry with time after surgical procedures for urolithiasis. A consecutive 24-h urine samples, including calcium, uric acid and citrate were collected before surgical treatments, 4 ~ 8 weeks after surgery and 6 months after surgery. The urinary protein to creatinine ratio was also repeated at each timepoint. Forty-seven patients completed the study. The quantity of 24-h urine chemistry, including calcium, uric acid and citrate, changed over time and tended to increase (p = 0.013, 0.076 and 0.004, respectively), but the changes were not prominent during short-term follow-up. In contrast, the urinary protein to creatinine ratio decreased (p < 0.001) after surgical treatment for symptomatic renal stones, and the change was reflected in short-term follow-up. However, the serial changes in the urinary protein to creatinine ratio were significantly related to the serial changes in the 24-h urinary chemistry (p < 0.001). Surgical decompression for symptomatic urolithiasis could decrease the urinary protein to creatinine ratio, indicating improvement from renal damage, which may be reflected in the increase in 24-h urinary chemistry, including calcium, uric acid and citrate. These results strengthen the previous guidelines for the timing of 24-h urine collection and provide new insight into the optimal timing from the perspective of renal function.

The Surgical Management of Urolithiasis: A Review of the Literature.

The incidence of stone disease has increased significantly in the past 30 years, with a reported prevalence of 11% of the U.S. population in 2022, up from 9% in 2012 and 5.2% in 1994.1 While prevention is a vital aspect of management, many patients present with symptomatic urolithiasis requiring surgical management. Emerging advances in endoscopy and technology has led to a dynamic shift in the surgical management of stone disease. This paper will serve as a comprehensive review to inform urologic and non-urologic medical professionals alike, as well as the layperson, on the surgical treatment of nephrolithiasis, starting from the initial evaluation, laboratory and radiographic studies, and various surgical options. Additionally, the nuances of managing the pediatric and pregnant patient with nephrolithiasis will be explored. Using the most up-to-date urologic data, our aim is to provide a comprehensive resource for readers who interact with patients experiencing acute episodes of urolithiasis.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Laser - utilization and settings.

Endocorporeal lithotripsy has progressed thanks to the development of lasers. Two laser sources are currently available: Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) and more recently Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL). The settings generally used are dusting, fragmentation, and "pop-corning". These are the first recommendations on laser use for stone management and their settings. Settings must be modulated and can be changed during the treatment according to the expected and obtained effects, the location and stone type that is treated. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations have been developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether or not the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.

2022 Recommendations of The AFU Lithiasis Committee: Open surgery and laparoscopy.

Only few hundred interventions are performed in France each year to remove upper urinary tract stones using a laparoscopic/robotic transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. These interventions are proposed to patients with large (>20mm) and complex stones, sometimes after failure of endoscopic techniques or in the presence of malformations that can be treated at the same time. The major interest of these interventions is the possibility to remove the whole stone without prior fragmentation. Some anatomical situations can increase the technical difficulty, particularly the presence of an intrarenal pelvis and the presence of pelvic and periureteral adhesions. The reported complications are essentially urinary fistula and ureteral stenosis, the risks of which are reduced by the use of double J stenting. As struvite stones are more friable, their whole removal is more difficult and may lead to dispersion of fragments, particularly during laparoscopy. Conventional open surgery has a higher stone-free rate, but comes with a greater kidney function loss. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) (EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022) and their adaptability to the French context.